To find the greatest value of y in the equation a4 x2 = (x2 + y2 )3 (Example XX, p. 42).
Assuming that y is a function of x, implicit differentiation (Simpson says: “by putting the whole equation into fluxions”) leads to 2a4x=3(x2+y2)2(2x+2yy′). But we have to make \(y' = 0\), so 2a4x=3(x2+y2)2(2x). Thus a23=x2+y2, which in turn becomes a63√3=(x2+y2)3. Since (x2+y2)=a4x2, we can conclude that a63√3=a4x2, whence
x=a√3√3.
Replacing this value in the original expression we get
y=a√23√3.
An alternative approach, also presented in Doctrine, goes as follows: Taking the cube root we arrive at a43x23=x2+y2, thus y2=a43x23−x2. Consequently, 2yy′=23a43x−13−2x, i.e.
y′=23a43x−13−2x2y.
Making y′=0, it follows that 23a43x−13−2x=0, hence
x=a4√27=a3√3.
Remark: An aspect not considered by Simpson is whether a maximum is actually attained by y at
x=a3√3.
First of all, let us note that he is undoubtedly working with the “positive part” of y defined by
y=√(a4x2)13−x2,x≤a.
This function adopts the value zero at x=0 and x=a, and is positive on (0,a). There is just one critical point, namely
x=a3√3.
Hence y attains its greatest value at this point.
Editor’s Note: This article was published in 2005.