Processing math: 100%

You are here

Thomas Simpson and Maxima and Minima - Maximizing y as an implicit function of x

Author(s): 
Michel Helfgott

To find the greatest value of y in the equation a4 x2 = (x2 + y2 )3 (Example XX, p. 42).

 

Assuming that y is a function of x, implicit differentiation (Simpson says: “by putting the whole equation into fluxions”) leads to 2a4x=3(x2+y2)2(2x+2yy). But we have to make \(y' = 0\), so 2a4x=3(x2+y2)2(2x). Thus a23=x2+y2, which in turn becomes a633=(x2+y2)3. Since (x2+y2)=a4x2, we can conclude that a633=a4x2, whence

x=a33.

Replacing this value in the original expression we get

y=a233.

An alternative approach, also presented in Doctrine, goes as follows: Taking the cube root we arrive at a43x23=x2+y2, thus y2=a43x23x2. Consequently, 2yy=23a43x132x, i.e.

y=23a43x132x2y.

Making y=0, it follows that 23a43x132x=0, hence

x=a427=a33.

Remark: An aspect not considered by Simpson is whether a maximum is actually attained by y at

x=a33.

First of all, let us note that he is undoubtedly working with the “positive part” of y defined by

y=(a4x2)13x2,xa.


This function adopts the value zero at x=0 and x=a, and is positive on (0,a). There is just one critical point, namely

x=a33.

Hence y attains its greatest value at this point.

 

Editor’s Note: This article was published in 2005.

Michel Helfgott, "Thomas Simpson and Maxima and Minima - Maximizing y as an implicit function of x," Convergence (August 2010)