Processing math: 100%

You are here

Thomas Simpson and Maxima and Minima - Maximizing a polynomial function

Author(s): 
Michel Helfgott

To determine the different values of x, when that of 3x4 - 28ax3 + 84a2 x2 - 96a3 x + 48b4 becomes a maximum or minimum (Example XXII, page 44).

 

Let f(x) be the given expression. Then f(x)=12x384ax2+168a2x96a3. The critical points of f(x) stem from the equation 12x384ax2+168a2x96a3=0, which is equivalent to x37ax2+14a2x8a3=0. By simple inspection we can realize that the latter equation has solutions x=a,x=2a,x=4a. Therefore f(x)=(xa)(x2a)(x4a). When x<a we have x<2a and x<4a, so f(x)<0; when x>a but x<2a we get x<4a, thus f(x)>0. By the first-derivative test we can conclude that f(x) adopts a local minimum at x=a. In a similar fashion one can prove that f(x) adopts a local maximum at x=2a and a local minimum at x=4a.

As a remark (“scholium”) after example XXII (page 45, last paragraph), Simpson discusses the function g(x)=24a3x30a2x2+16ax33x4. We have g(x)=24a360a2x+48ax212x3. Factoring out 12, without much effort we get g(x)=12(xa)2(x2a). In a small neighborhood of x=a the derivative is positive, so g(x) does not adopt a local maximum or minimum at x=a. But it does adopt a local maximum at x=2a because for x<2a the derivative is positive, while for x>2a the derivative is negative.

 

Remark: Both f(x) and g(x) are easy to analyze through the first-derivative test since their derivatives can be factored without much difficulty. The above-mentioned examples may seem rather ad hoc, nonetheless they illustrate quite well how an important test works.

 

Editor’s Note: This article was published in 2005.

Michel Helfgott, "Thomas Simpson and Maxima and Minima - Maximizing a polynomial function," Convergence (August 2010)