Processing math: 1%

You are here

D'Alembert, Lagrange, and Reduction of Order - The Classroom

Author(s): 
Sarah Cummings (Wittenberg University) and Adam E. Parker (Wittenberg University)

We now share questions about using the technique of reduction of order that we hope are helpful even for those well versed in the method. 


In practice, this method is often used only to reduce a second order linear differential equation as follows.

Question 1.

Given that y1=x1 is a solution of the linear differential equation

2x2y

find the second solution.

Solution 1. Assume the second solution can be written in the form y_2=u x^{-1}.  Substituting y_2'=u' x^{-1}-u x^{-2} and y_2'' = u''x^{-1}-2u'x^{-2}+2ux^{-3} gives

2x^2 (u''x^{-1}-2u'x^{-2}+2ux^{-3})+x(u' x^{-1}-u x^{-2})-3ux^{-1} =0.

Since y=x^{-1} solves the equation 2x^2 y''+xy'-3y =0, we have

2x^2 (x^{-1})''+x (x^{-1})'-3x^{-1} =2x^2 (2x^{-3})+x (-x^{-2})-3x^{-1} = 0.

Substituting this into 2x^2 (u''x^{-1}-2u'x^{-2}+2ux^{-3})+x(u' x^{-1}-u x^{-2})-3ux^{-1} =0 gives the differential equation

2u''x-4u'+u'=0.

Letting w=u' we have

2w' x - 3w =0, which is a separable first order linear equation and gives  w=x^{3/2}.  So u=\int w\, = \frac{2}{5} x^{5/2}. Thus y_2=u y_1 = \frac{2}{5}x^{5/2}x^{-1} = \frac{2}{5}x^{3/2}, which is our second solution (up to a constant).


An unfortunate consequence of students only ever reducing second order equations a_2(x) y''+a_1(x) y'+a_0(x) y=0

is that often they simply memorize the formula [15, p. 135]

u=\int\frac{e^{-\int \frac{a_1(x)}{a_2(x)}dx}}{y_1^2(x)}dx,

which masks the full power of the method.  We can avoid memorization by asking questions that naturally generalize the second order process given in a textbook.  For example, we can start with a differential equation of order >2.

Question 2. Given that y_1=e^x is a solution to y'''+3y''-4y = 0, reduce the order to a second order equation.

Solution 2. Since y_1=e^x is a solution, we assume another solution is of the form y_2=uy_1.  Then, substituting y_2'=u'y_1+uy_1', y_2''=u''y_1 + 2 u'y_1'+uy_1'', etc. into the differential equation gives

u'''+6u''+9u'=0

or the second order equation

y''+6y'+9y=0.


A slightly more difficult problem is to reduce the order when multiple solutions are provided.

Question 3. Given that y_1=e^x and y_2=xe^{-2x} are solutions to

y'''+3y''-4y = 0,

find the third solution.

Solution 3. As in Question 2, we start with y_1=e^x and suppose the third solution has the form y_3=uy_1.  Substitution into the differential equation shows u must satisfy

u'''+6u''+9u'=0

or if w=u'

w''+6w'+9w=0.

We now restart the process, knowing that w_1=\left(\frac{y_2}{y_1}\right)' solves w''+6w'+9w=0. This means \frac{y_2}{y_1} solves u'''+6u''+9u'=0 and could play the role of u in y_3=uy_1.  Unfortunately, doing so gives y_3=u y_1 = \left(\frac{y_2}{y_1}\right)y_1= y_2 and returns a known solution.

Rather, proceed as in Question 1, and suppose the second solution to w''+6w'+9w=0 is of the form w_2=vw_1=v\left(\frac{y_2}{y_1}\right)'=v(xe^{-3x})' for some unknown function v.  Substitution into w''+6w'+9w=0 gives

(1-3x)v''-6v'=0

which has a solution

v=\frac{c_1}{1-3x}+c_2

and so

w_2 =vw_1= \left(\frac{c_1}{1-3x}+c_2 \right)\left(\frac{y_2}{y_1}\right)'=\left(\frac{c_1}{1-3x}+c_2 \right)(xe^{-3x})'

= c_1e^{-3x}+(1-3x)c_2 e^{-3x}.

Thus u=c_1e^{-3x}+c_2 xe^{-3x} which gives y_3 = e^x(c_1e^{-3x}+c_2 xe^{-3x})=c_1e^{-2x}+c_2xe^{-2x}. Since we were given that y_2=xe^{-2x} is a solution, we can disregard it and find that  y_3=e^{-2x}.


Now that we have thoroughly reviewed the modern technique and its uses in the classroom, we discuss its origins.

Sarah Cummings (Wittenberg University) and Adam E. Parker (Wittenberg University), "D'Alembert, Lagrange, and Reduction of Order - The Classroom," Convergence (September 2015)