Author(s):
Robert J. Wisner (New Mexico State University)
That the center of attention here is irrational can be seen by being reminded of this argument: If √3 were rational, it could be written as the reduced fraction √3=ab for integers a and b. Then by squaring both sides, the result is the equation a2=3b2. Now if a and b are each written as their unique product of primes, then the prime 3 occurs on the left side of this equation an even number of times, while on the right side, 3 occurs an odd number of times. Such a situation violates the Unique Factorization Theorem, so the equation just above is impossible, whence √3 must be irrational.
Note, however, that, to six decimal places, √3≈1.732051=17320511000000. This is a reduced fraction since 1732051 is a prime. We will now look at three other ways to arrive at fractional approximations that are "equivalent" in that they also have six-place decimal accuracy: first, by use of the classical Greek ladder for √3; second, by examining the convergents of a continued fraction for √3; and, third, by using iterates of Newton's Method.
Robert J. Wisner (New Mexico State University), "A Disquisition on the Square Root of Three - Approximation by Rational Numbers," Convergence (December 2010), DOI:10.4169/loci003514